The one thing that comes to mind is to make certain that you don't create entitlements, and that when the next round of investment comes, it's based on the same merit the first round was based on. I think that's very critical, because you want to create some tension. All the scientists underneath, who are doing the projects, you can know their feet are held to the fire. So I think the organizations that are receiving the money shouldn't automatically get it, and that those programs and their plans need to be rock solid. They need to have delivered in the last round. I think this is very important, that you invest in success. I'd say that's a piece of advice from me, and I'm conflicted...I get the money. But I believe very strongly that you should make sure that happens.
The program itself is a great idea. It could be bigger. We could bring more people in as well, but of course as it sits now, I think you've done pretty well.