Minister, you have indicated that there will be a review undertaken by your expert panel of the situation at the Brooks plant.
My question is this: do you not feel that you very obviously lose independence of a review when the very person responsible for chairing that review and the president of the organization who will have to receive the criticism for efficiencies and remedy problems is the very same person? It lacks independence, and it's independence that's required when you are doing an examination of something that went wrong.