—and CFIA would then have another issue to deal with if it loses in the certification process.
Yes, day to day CFIA is doing the things that need to be done on the plant floor around those critical components going back and forth. What I'm asking is this: if the changes to HACCP come along, and the independent third party review comes through on an annual basis to see if they're doing the things they need to do, what is the dialogue back and forth?
This is at a higher level than just an inspector, by the way. This is not about a front-line inspector and a carcass; this is now about the system.
Is there something in this legislation, or is the process now in place, to require this dialogue to go back and forth? If it is, I think we should recognize it, because it's important to know that and it's wonderful if it's happening. If it's not happening to the same degree as maybe it should, perhaps we have to incorporate it some way with a minor tweak to the legislation.
That's really what I'm trying to find out.