I wouldn't disagree with you, but in the same breath, the act has an umbrella and the regulations serve a purpose, and to change an act is even harder than to change regulations. I think we have to make sure that we clarify what should be in the act and what should be in the regulations, but that's a different debate from what I want to get into today.
In the Senate committee you talked about the example of the prohibition of imports that are going to be, and I'm not sure if manufactured is the right word. Maybe you could give me an example to help everybody understand. This is when an ingredient is brought in and it goes through the process, and when it first comes to Canada it doesn't meet the regulations but once it goes through the process in Canada, it meets the regulation.
Can you give me an example of a food product or a spice in that situation?