I appreciate your response. I don't agree. I think it should be explicit, not implicit. I think what you just described is an implicit process, not an explicit process. We don't always all agree with certain standards that might be accepted by the government. You referenced Codex, and perhaps we all will, and perhaps some don't, so it isn't an all-in or all-out process. It's a democratic process whereby the government's will is such that it accepts certain standards that may not be accepted as standards by future governments.
My reason for referencing this piece in this particular way is to say, let's be explicit; let's not be implicit in this piece. But I appreciate the clarification, and I thank you for that. I do understand what you're saying. We just differ in our view of how we should communicate that to folks.
(Amendment negatived)
(Clause 52 agreed to)
(Clauses 53 to 66 inclusive agreed to)
(On clause 67—Regulations)