It is. Let me not read it, but simply say that I respect the fact that Ms. Barnes has told us that in paragraph 51(1)(e) it specifically talks about a regulation that can be created—not necessarily that is created, but can be.
What we were hearing from the importers and exporters is a recognition that it can be. What they're saying is that they actually want to see it explicitly in the act that it will be, not that it can be through regulation through Governor in Council—which is all wonderful, but that doesn't make it so if they decide not to do it.
Their piece was that they actually want to see it stated in the act, so that they know it is, not that it might be, because clearly this is a “might be” act when it comes to paragraph 51(1)(e). That's not saying it will be, and I look to Ms. Barnes to tell me if I'm right about that.
This is actually not creating it; it's saying they can do it. Is that correct?