Again, their concern was that the regulation might be something favourable to them, or it might not be. It can be an either/or in this situation. The regulation could be, “You cannot do that”, as I see it in paragraph 51(1)(e). Notwithstanding that, their position was this: “Let's just state it in the act so that we can see it.” A number of witnesses asked whether things being done in this regard, especially by reference as regulations come out, are going to be part of that process. I don't know that. I'm not asking you to actually answer to that process. That's a political piece, and that's fine. I think their intent around this issue was to say, “Let's just see it.” That's where it's at.
Notwithstanding how you've explained things, and that Mr. Valeriote has actually withdrawn his, I'm happy just to go to the vote, Mr. Chair.