No, I wouldn't lock it at 25%, because the Grain Commission's cost structure could change over time and all of a sudden the percentage would be out. That was simply to point out what we think is right and what is being proposed—9% versus 25%—and it was trying to compare those apples to apples for the here and now. It's not an absolute 20% or 25% going forward. It's more that here are the items we think the public purse should pay for, and if it totals $20 million, that's $20 million the government needs to support going forward, regardless of the CGC's cost structure around that for other services.
On November 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.