Cost-effectiveness, of course, is another aspect. We don't want to have to go back to group FOA, or some of those other aspects that were required in the past.
Would you also agree that one of the concerns the shippers had.... I'm trying to gauge what you feel for ITAC users would be the most important aspects. You've identified the need for a level-of-service agreement for every shipper, understanding that the actual details will be different with each shipper, because not every shipper has the same ability to provide their details or commitments moving forward, and they need to have an easy mechanism by which to hold railways accountable to that level-of-service agreement.
There's another aspect I would like to raise that I have some concerns with, and which shippers raised with me, and I'm not sure it's even plausible. I am referring to the level of service or the standards that we, as Canadians, put on, being enforced as our grain goes across other borders. I'm not sure it's even possible for us to impose our rules on, say, the Americans or the Mexicans. Would you agree with that?