The grain research laboratory is a real gem that the Canadian Grain Commission has. It does a lot of great work and puts quality parameters around each year's crop. For instance, if that were moved from the Canadian Grain Commission to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and considered a research mandate and funded as research, that would take that cost out of the system. Maybe it shouldn't be; you would have to work closely with the Canadian Grain Commission. But either way, if it were funded entirely through government contributions, that would take that cost out of the system.
The Canadian Grain Commission has to do things related to food safety. It has to do things related to policy development. All of those things should be considered part of the public good. If you went through all of that, rather than 7% or 8% or 10% of the budget being considered public good, it should be 20% or 25%. It would take millions of dollars of costs out of the system that then wouldn't have to be collected from shippers and farmers in user fees. I think other countries have done a better job than we have in getting those costs out of the system.