I guess the position is that mandatory outward inspection should be removed.
The Canadian Grain Commission should and could still have an accreditation role for any third-party inspections. If you have a country, let's say Brazil, and they decide that this customer in Brazil wants a certificate from some third party, and that's what they desire for the grain purchase, why do you mandate that the Canadian Grain Commission also must charge, under the new user fees, $1.60 per tonne, when that cost is much higher than what the private inspector will want and it's not desired by the purchaser?
In cases where it isn't required, or isn't useful, let the buyer and seller decide what service it is. Let the Canadian Grain Commission oversee it. But the Canadian Grain Commission charges under the new user fees of $1.60 per tonne are about four times what a private inspector will charge to do the same job, because the Canadian Grain Commission has all these overhead costs that must be recouped through user fees.