No, no. Sorry. The nitrogen.... It's trying to get better fertilizer costs. Merv is about the same age as I am, and by the time he's ready to retire, I won't be interested. I don't think he has anything to fear.
We've looked at a number of issues. In 1980 a German engineering friend showed me a plan for a modular wind-powered anhydrous ammonia plant. I followed up with him in 2005. I hired an engineer to look at it, but it's just not practical. Wind power is too expensive. In Manitoba we have relatively low electricity rates, so we'd be better to just put a motor on it. The engineer said it would cost us between $800 and $900 a tonne to make it at this modular, small-scale plant, so that was a non-starter.
I've looked for biological fertilizer options around the world. We tested some of them at our farm last year. I went to Cuba. Because they've been cut off from a lot of the rest of the world, they had to develop some of their own innovations. They used azotobacter; I didn't get a good handle on it when I was in Cuba, but they had some fantastic crops with no visible nitrogen application. They used earthworm castings. They used manures. They used crop rotations. In some of those cases, the literature shows that azotobacter could replace 50% of the nitrogen. I just haven't found it on our own farm. I've talked to people all around the world and actually tried to get an LMO to bring in a research scientist from the former Yugoslavia who had just finished her Ph.D. on biological nitrogen replacers, but I was turned down.
Otherwise there are at least three plants that have been proposed, and FNA, Farmers of North America, is one of them. I've put money into that one. There's another one with the North Dakota Corn Growers Association, which may not be the most appropriate name for it. The Manitoba Canola Growers Association and some other commodity groups in Manitoba have linked up with that one to see if something can happen there. Those large plants are being proposed, and I hope that at least one or two of them go ahead.
Further to that—