Mr. Lemieux, first of all, in terms of your opening comments, it is true that with these tolerance levels—no matter what issue you're talking about, whether it's genetic modification or it's some kind of foreign material and other seeds and that sort of thing in the grain-handling system—zero is extremely difficult or impossible to achieve, which is why we're into this area.
The other point that I think is important is I congratulate the Government of Canada for the way they have addressed this issue by pointing the LLP initiative to defining “low-level presence” in terms of products that have been safety assessed using an international protocol by a competent authority in another country. We're not talking about products we don't know anything about, that have never been safety assessed. We're targeting only those products that have been approved by a competent authority somewhere else before they're supplied. So health and safety are very important points.
I certainly want to hear what the organic sector has to say on the issue. I don't think the LLP initiative should be as big a concern from an organic point of view. In the case of the Canadian initiative, for example, an LLP policy for Canada, we are not talking about seed imports, products that are coming into Canada that would go for cultivation, we're talking about products coming in that go for processing. They would go to food-for-feed processing or industrial purposes. They're into a commercial chain that takes them into processing, as opposed to something that's going to be open to the environment and become an issue in the Canadian environment. The risk of any concern, in terms of LLP, should be low.