Pierre's right. In the case of business risk management programs that are demand-driven, if you don't have demand, you don't pay out. In this case, in AgriStability in particular, we expect lower payments, because the sector is doing extremely well.
The changes that you noted were agreed to by FPT ministers, so ministers from all provinces, territories and the federal government agreed to changes. But they wanted to make sure there would still be fairly extensive coverage for producers, so when the sector is doing very well, the premiums for insurance go up, for example, because there's more acreage being brought into production, and because the crop has a higher value. So AgriInsurance payments, which the federal government shares with producers and provinces, go up. In either case there's a payment mechanism that's going to be there, either on the insurance side or on the AgriStability side.
At the same time we are keeping AgriInvest, and that's actually growing, because it's based on net sales. So as sales go up, the payments under AgriInvest go up.
The disaster coverage remains in place, so that if there are floods, if there are other weather- or pest-induced disasters, farmers will be covered.