First of all, the policy that proposes that action level does not apply to seed; it's only for food and feed. In the seed industry, we are not yet at the point of determining what the action level and the thresholds would be for seed. What we are saying is that we need to make sure that whatever policy gets developed for the grain industry is not at a level that we can't carry as the foundation of the grain industry and the seed industry. So if it's set so incredibly low and they expect the seed industry that's produced in the same open biological systems to carry it, that would be difficult. Conversely, we wouldn't want to set a threshold in seed that's at a point where it would make the grain threshold way too high for international acceptance. So we need to work on that.
We have been saying all along that seed is different from grain, for a number of reasons. One is that we intentionally introduce our product into the environment, and the other is that the seed industry already practises very strict regulatory controls to keep our product separate and to keep it pure and true to its variety and its identity. So we believe that needs to be taken into consideration. We've been trading seed around the world under those standards for years, for decades, and it does allow very small proportions of other seeds. In a lot of clover you're allowed one canola seed, for example, in certain classifications, and we know that the one canola seed, if it's coming from Canada, is likely GM or GE.
So we're talking about taking those into account, and as much as possible mirroring those standards that are already in place to govern seed. But we have not actually defined the threshold levels yet.