We're very happy that Canada is playing this leadership role. Relying so heavily on the export market, particularly in our grain industry, we believe that you can't go out and tell other countries that it's inevitable that there might be a low-level presence of a product you haven't approved in your country, so they should be looking at a low-level presence policy. It's not really right to do that if you don't do that in your own country.
We're saying that while the system we do have in place in Canada works well, where if it's detected you do a risk assessment and then you have flexibility to determine how to bring it back into compliance, it would work very well for a domestic...and given our regulatory system and the relationship the industry has with regulators in Canada, but it's not an exportable program. For us to go out to other countries and say they need to have a program, without having one ourselves, is not a very good idea. We've been very supportive of Canada developing a domestic policy that's science-based, predictable, proactive, that facilitates trade, and that can serve as a model for other countries.