It's very clear that the action level requires an assumption of safety based on an evaluation of another country's regulatory system. If Health Canada says that the U.S. or Chinese system is acceptable, that's a generalized assessment based on the Codex international principles, which are, firstly, also open to interpretation. For example, Canada implements the Codex guidelines differently from the European Union in at least one case. We also see the issue where Canada could evaluate a particular country as having an acceptable regulatory regime. But of course on a case-by-case basis we could see that the approval of a particular GM product is compromised in that country because of political interference or any number of issues. We would not necessarily see that happening.
So we're actually asking Canadians to trust in a generalized way the regulatory system of another country as to what we're allowing into our country through LLP. Will that be in perpetuity, or will there be a review every five years or 10 years? Is there a public notice that provides information to Canadians on which countries we agree have a regulatory system that's safe enough to assume a low level of safety through an action level? There are all kinds of questions about that. Is the action level based on someone else's science, or another country's evaluation of corporate science? We've already asked Canadians to trust Health Canada in relation to GM food safety. Now we're saying that Health Canada actually doesn't have a role to play in this particular consumption of these GM foods.