I think the best example is whisky. Whiskies around the world have to meet a couple of tests. One, it can only be made from grain. Two, it has to be distilled. If you distill it all the way, you get vodka because you take all the grain essence out. Three, it has to be matured in wooden casks. If it doesn't meet those things, it's not whisky. And it has to be 40% alcohol.
We had to sue a previous federal government in Federal Court to get the government and, to a certain extent, the CFIA to change the legal definition of Canadian whisky so that it said it had to be made in Canada, that it had to be aged in Canada, and that it had to be 40% alcohol. We had to sue the government to get that change.
The reason we needed that change was that when it goes to other countries, we don't decide what scotch whisky is in Canada. Canada refers to the rules in the U.K. for what defines scotch whisky, and if you meet those rules you can call it scotch whisky in Canada, or Irish whisky or bourbon, or those kinds of things. So we needed clear Canadian regulation that would say that this is what Canadian whisky is, so that when we go to Japan the Japanese government can differentiate between real Canadian products and fake Canadian products.