I'm not surprised to hear that.
Let me ask a second question about moratoriums and bans. Certainly I, and our government, believe that those types of decisions—moratoriums and bans—must be based on sound science. If they're not based on sound science, what are they based on? They can be based on a wide variety of different issues, but sound science must be a criterion.
Let me ask a question to you, Pierre. Is the science on this conclusive?