First off, I wasn't aware of the federation's assertion of a 30% decline. They sent the resolution to the office, but they didn't send any background information.
I think the federal government through PMRA is addressing the issue. Maybe it's not to the satisfaction of all; maybe it's too much for others. They're taking a guarded approach, and they have our trust that they are looking at scientific evidence. We have been told that if they find scientific evidence they're comfortable with, they may impose a ban on the product during this re-evaluation process.
Somewhere along the line, we have to have trust in our regulatory system. I believe the CHC has trust in our regulatory system to do the right thing. If the right thing is to ban, then so be it. If it is not, based on science, then it's not. We have to find a process and a practice to mitigate our risks.