You talked about your funding model being this project piece, which we all know means reapplying and keeping fingers crossed that it's written really well this time. Is the priority still there? Has it drifted away?
My own personal view is you need sustained funding because actually, this won't go away. This is a 20-year project, in my view, if you want to take it down the road.
I see Mr. Lambert indicating that he wants to speak to that issue. Feel free, either one, to talk about what the funding model should look like as far as where we take this piece down the road, because the trust piece takes a long time to develop. It doesn't happen in a year. It doesn't happen because I got invited to a round table on a couple of occasions and got to sit beside a certain person and we talked about our kids playing soccer in the summer. Isn't that right? It takes a whole lot of time to do that and players change.
How do you see this developing over the longer term? What would your recommendation be on what we need to do, as a committee, as far as making a recommendation—because we are going to make a recommendation about this—about how this organization should go forward and what kind of funding it should look at?
Mr. Lambert, I think you wanted to comment.