The reality here is that you're losing customers. There was already a mention that you're losing customers in Japan, in China. It's unbelievable. We're even losing customers in the United States. There was a report out that General Mills couldn't even get enough oats from us up here.
At the end of the day, last June the writing was on the wall. There was going to be a big crop. There was some concern. The railway act had no teeth in it so come fall there was nothing in place. There was no monitoring. There were no teeth. In many articles you read that farmers are not happy with the study and the monitoring process that has been put in place. That's not really going to help the grain to move.
I guess my question is this. As soon as the ships have to start waiting because they can't get the grain they need, shouldn't that be where the bell should ring and the government says, okay, look, the farmers are not getting their products to market, they're losing every week that the prices are dropping? Shouldn't there be some sort of watchdog or something with more teeth in it that would automatically hold people accountable if the customers are not getting their product? That's my first question.
My second question is what are the repercussions besides the $2 billion you're going to lose this year? What are the repercussions of losing all those customers? You mentioned how the Australian grains are going to be coming on. The next thing is Argentina. You are losing those customers. What are the repercussions of trying to get your customers back, even if they ever fix this railroad problem?
I'll just leave it to whoever wants to answer.