Maybe I'll start, and let Greg and John jump in if they want.
Thanks for the question. We think added competition is ideally the solution that you would want in an ideal world. The problem is this. How do you get to effective competition, given the structure of the system? When you're an elevator planted in the middle of Saskatchewan and you have a CN line running up to your facility, you don't even have a duopoly. You're beholden to a monopoly. It is very difficult to get to a situation of true competition. That's why we tend to look for regulatory solutions. If you can't figure out how to get to a truly competitive environment because of the nature of the rail industry, then we need to simulate that balance that we would otherwise see by propping up the system with regulation. That's why we've been proposing regulatory solutions as opposed to.... Because if you could truly get an open marketplace in the rail industry the way it exists today, it would be there already.