Okay.
Are there other comments? I want to take some direction. I have my own opinion and it is that we have a time schedule for a reason. Similarly, that also goes for the five minutes of questioning. I'll maybe give some leniency in terms of the wrapping up, but I really want to stay as close to time to get as many questions in for the witnesses as is possible.
I think the message to the members is that if you want to eat up your time on the preamble, that's your choice, but if you want to get the questions out, that's also your choice.
So that you know, I'm going to exercise some discretion. It depends where we're at, and I'll take that on as the chair. But it is my thought that we should respect the time the presenters give us, and also respect the time of each of the members to ask their questions.
I'm assuming we would wish to stay with the five-minute rounds as we go down the line. There have been times where we have a bit of time at the end, and that becomes subject to discussion with the chair as to allowing maybe two-minute rounds to get a couple of questions in. I will try to be fair with that. That's why I believe the motion is written the way it is.
I have a motion on the floor. It is moved by Mr. Payne.
(Motion agreed to)
There is one more, I believe, and it's the order of questions. This has to do with the speaking order: that the order of questions for the first round of questioning shall be as follows: New Democrats, Conservatives, and Liberals. Questioning during the second round shall be as follows: Conservatives, New Democrats, Conservatives, New Democrats, Conservatives, New Democrats, Conservatives, and Conservatives. Based on the principle that each committee member should have a full opportunity to question the witnesses, if time permits, further rounds shall be at the discretion of the chair—this goes back to the comment on the earlier motion.
Are there questions?
It's moved by Mr. Zimmer.
(Motion agreed to)
I believe that wraps up the standing rules.
For your information, before we get to any questions, I think everyone knows it, but there is a delegation of financial authority, which I signed because I was asked to. This is to inform you that I wish to delegate the authority for expenditure initiation of up to $10,000 for travel expenditures, up to $5,000 for conference fees and membership fees, and up to $1,000 for hospitality expenditures—that's where the sandwiches kick in—