Thank you, Ms. Brosseau.
Going to the points I outlined earlier, we want the corridor-specific requirement—we don't want anybody left out—so that there is no preference given to an alleyway that's easier to deliver to.
Again, we want a reference to the penalty for lack of service or non-performance. It's our desire, I guess, that this penalty not actually be used, but that it be a deterrent, so that the service would be there. As Mr. Phillips pointed out, it would mainly be just an underpinning, so the penalty would be in place to encourage the railways to provide the service. We hope it wouldn't have to get to that, but it would be there if needed.
I'll defer to one of my colleagues. I don't have all of my points right at the top of my head.