You didn't speak to him. I checked with him today. I did speak with him today about this amendment, and he supports the government legislation the way it is, because he feels that....
I can speak about the way I feel. We support the government legislation, but the problem that we have here is also what we heard from witnesses about getting too specific over volumes related to corridors.
This simply says, “Subject to volume demand and corridor capacity”, which is sufficient. We don't need to get overly prescriptive. So we had, for example, Robert Ballantyne—he's the president of the Freight Management Association of Canada—say, an “intervention such as in Bill C-30 needs to be applied very carefully and only under the most extraordinary circumstances”. In saying that, he is supporting more the clause the way it's worded now, which simply says “Subject to volume demand and corridor capacity”, without drilling down below that.