Thanks.
I'll just conclude with the comment that it's not the role of government to insert itself in a contractual sense between a buyer and a seller. Those two negotiate their terms. They decide if they're going to enter into a contract or not. It is not for the government to be in there trying to determine if what they are actually negotiating is accurate or fair. If one or the other side feels that it's not accurate or fair, then they don't enter into the contract. However, this provision allows, if there's a contract breach, for it to be arbitrated. That's what the witnesses were asking for.
This clause, as it stands right now in the legislation, allows the commission to arbitrate. There is a strategy here for when contracts break down. They can be arbitrated by the commission. The way it's worded now is fine, but what you're proposing is very problematic.