Mr. Chair, I think we need to look at this in the scheme of things. Of course, this year's crop could be a norm. We could be seeing this, we hope, for many years to come. Big money—over $8 billion—has been lost here by the agricultural community. We have had so many witnesses come here, and this House and this committee have spent so much time on this, that I think that sunset part should be taken out of there.
Even at the very least, there should be a review after a couple of years to review what the status is instead of sunsetting it. It's been a very trying situation in the last few months for everybody, especially the farmers, but even for the railroads and everybody, because we're trying to understand where we're going. I think the sunset part is something that should not be in there. A compromise would be a review at that time. If the so-called system that's in place now works, why not leave it there instead of dropping it? Maybe we could review it and tweak it. I think the sunset part should be taken out and replaced with “a review at that time” as we go forward from then.