It's in with this bill. I don't think this whole bill is intended to say that if a farmer has 5,000 tonnes of bushels of barley that is supposed to land at Chicago for $8 and it doesn't happen because of changes in the marketplace—we're not into that. We're not trying to make sure the farmer gets his money from the person he's selling to.
The whole bill is about if somebody is not transporting the grain in a timely manner so that they receive the money, then somebody has to pay the farmer. It's not his fault that the locomotives aren't moving.
It's not a contract between the buyer and the farmer; it's more a service level agreement; that the grain was supposed to be shipped and I have lost this money because it wasn't shipped. It wasn't moved, and now I am owed $10,000, as a farmer. Okay, how am I going to get paid? Do I have to go to another process and a sort of judicial system? It was mentioned before here. We have big companies with deep pockets and big lawyers. I don't really know what the system in place—