I'm not in a dispute with Mr. Hoback. I don't think I've ever disagreed with anything since both of us landed here. It's just on the point you made, that this falls under the privy of the Department of Agriculture. Well, apparently it doesn't, because this whole thing is going to be under Transport.
What you stated is that if there is a wrongdoing and it's determined to be a wrongdoing, and there are losses—whether to the shipper and eventually to the farmer, whatever—the ruling would be made by Transport. Transport would make it to the rail—if it's the rail, of course. You guys have the stick, and they usually comply when Transport.... Yes, they can go to court, but they're technically going to court against Transport Canada, not the farmer and the shipper, because you guys made the ruling.
Is that clear?