I also do not want to be remiss but to thank all of the departmental staff for being here this morning, in case of need for clarification. I appreciate that you would take the time to be with us.
With that we have the motion for the new clause 5.1, amendment G-1, which is moved by Mr. Lemieux. Also clause 6 and clause 15 are consequential to clause 5.1.
Simply to formalize the wording of it, the decision on amendment G-1 applies to G-2 and to G-3, since they are consequential amendments. Before we get to the question, is there any debate on it? Hearing none, I would ask for a motion regarding G-1.