There is no one who is happier to debate the food and fuel argument than this guy right here. It's mostly simply not based in scientific fact or in economic data. We produce more food today on less land in Canada than we ever have in our nation's history. We think that the econometrics that are associated with the food and fuel debate have not been borne out statistically with data. The fact is, when we produce ethanol, we are only extracting part of the molecule, and we're returning everything else to the food industry through dried distillers grains or through some of the other co-products that I had mentioned before.
The bottom line is that the food and fuel debate does not pan out on the economics of scale, and we are creating additional value from that corn, or from that soy, or from that canola.