I don't think I need to do that.
I think the crisis we've identified within the bioeconomy—and that includes forestry; that includes the automotive sector; it includes chemicals, pesticides, and crop life and the agriculture industry—is that we all have different champions in government, and they don't always necessarily work with one another when they're developing policies. Even within one department you can have different subdepartments that are working at loggerheads with one another.
What we appreciate most about the European and American policies is that they do take a fundamental assumption, which is that we need to have sustainable products, and we need to use those sustainable products to expand our available resources for the future. That is kind of a condition precedent under which all public policy is undertaken. That is the ask that we have of Canada's government in the future. We would like to have a bioeconomy strategy, in the same way that we have a digital strategy, in the same way that we have any other strategy. It's important that we do so because it sends an important signal into the international markets that Canada is serious about the bioeconomy.