That's a very pertinent question, and I'm happy to do that.
As you may know, the Senate passed Bill C-30 last night. As I understand it, royal assent will be put to that bill tomorrow at some point. When it comes to the regulatory package that goes along with that, as you know, the legislation is an umbrella that creates the ability to put regulations in place. We went that route because regulations are more flexible. They can be more timely and you can adapt and change them to what's needed on an ongoing basis, as opposed to coming back to the House all the time on legislative changes.
When it comes to any type of compensation for farmers, I guess rather than compensate farmers after the fact, which is what was done prior to this, this piece of legislation and the regulatory package that will be attached to it will actually see to it that farmers are not hurt to begin with. What this does is make sure that the railways deliver the product from where it's asked to be delivered from, and in a timely way, to whichever port facility the shipper wants it to go to. There's no more opportunity for storage of grains costs or demurrage costs along that chain going back to the farm gate. They are now stopped in the service level agreements between the shipper of record, whoever that may be, and the railway of record. That's the difference, in that it doesn't require compensation to farmers because they are now covered proactively under those service level agreements.