The main positive response out of the science cluster format is that it's results-based. We sit down with industry, academia, our provincial partners in agriculture, and then industry that will deliver the goods, as it were, when it's new varieties, new chemicals, new fertilizers, and things like that. We work with all of them to come up with the result that the farm industry has said they require. In that regard, they're getting what they're asking for in a much more timely way.
I know there's some concern that somehow Ag Canada has lost its long-term vision. Nothing could be further from the truth. We just do it in five-year bite-sized chunks now. With Andrea Lyon and the other ADMs and so on, we sit around and talk about programs 10, 15, and 20 years out. The discussions are already under way for GF3 and those types of things.
So certainly the long-term vision is out there. Doing it in five-year chunks means you actually get a result, because you have a timeline that says within this Growing Forward 2, in that five-year window, we'll have these results. It's giving us much more proactivity in that regard.