Currently, a number of changes are going on, but I'll use one example.
A producer must provide a proof of sale when he repays an advance. The intent of the program was it was a marketing program and the producer was to sell the crop and repay the advance. However, we end up with situations that were described earlier, where the producer at the end of the year, for very good reasons, has decided not to market that year: the market is down; the basis is too wide; whatever the point may be, they decided to move into the next year.
With the amendments to our legislation we're allowing an administrator to recognize that their product is still in the bin; the producer has not sold it and not repaid it. The producer would then be able to reimburse the advance from whatever proceeds he may choose to use, should that be the sale of another product, whatever the case may be.