I have not so much a question as a comment.
Although I understand the intent of this amendment, I think it is important to recognize that the agricultural growth act is not an act in its own right. It's legislation that is called an amending statute, so it's going to amend, as you've clearly pointed out, nine other pieces of legislation. Basically, once the provisions come into force, the act is basically spent. It's going to go into those other acts to amend those other acts. The agricultural growth act, Bill C-18 itself, doesn't have any life to it once its provisions have been implemented in the nine other acts.
The other thing I would point out on the five-year review period, is that when you look at the nine different acts it impacts, there are different review periods associated with those different acts. To give you an example, the PBRA has a ten-year review window. The AMPA has a five-year review period. The FDMA, Farm Debt Mediation Act, has a five-year window. So the proposed amendment doesn't actually address what you ultimately want, and I don't think we want to go through all the acts and specify something that has already been specified in certain of those acts already.