Let me start with RMP. We've always been very clear we're not going to fund at a federal level anything new like RMP, because it's countervailable. The national cattlemen's association actually has come out with very good statements—and I can get those for you—saying, don't do this, it's going to lead to countervail, especially with the U.S. looking for a pushback on COOL.
When it comes to the Ontario livestock, I had the same meeting with Dan Darling and his guys. The problem isn't with us and the changes at AgriStability. Everybody told us for years that this is not bankable, it's not predictable, and to do something better, so we did. We made some changes to AgriStability to allow us to bring forward an insurance program for livestock, and Ontario has not picked that up. That's the problem. If they want to actually do some lobbying, it would probably be best directed at the Ontario government, which has not implemented the livestock insurance side of it and which of course would give them that bankability and predictability that they're looking for.