I expect that's the case. I just think that perhaps that 95% number may be a bit high, if you broke the domestic market out of that and looked more at the provincially registered abattoirs.
Another comment you made, and I've heard it now several times, was that the technical measures in the processes should not be more restrictive than they need to be. I think we're all in agreement with that. Is part of breaking down some of the trade barriers as simple as having all of the provincially licensed slaughterhouses and abattoirs licensed for the domestic market straight across the country, but not for export? And if anyone wants to be in the export industry or is supplying two lines and it's better economics for them because they're selling to the big-box stores and the domestic industry and they're also selling into the international market, then they would be federally inspected.
But if you're on the border across the river in Hull and you're producing a product that can be marketed on the Ontario side of the river, then why shouldn't you be able to market it there? It's obviously healthy, and it's obviously not any danger to society or to the individuals who are buying it.
Are we making this more complex than we need to, or should we be rethinking the box?