Sure. Starting out with the fusarium one, about five years ago, when this became.... Well, it's been an issue for a long time. It started out in corn, and now it's more in other cereals that we're seeing the issue. A number of years ago when this became a really big issue, we actually asked the Minister of Agriculture in Alberta to do a scientific review of the situation of fusarium, because all of our members and farm organizations in that area were telling us that areas of the province did have fusarium in fairly substantial occurrences. He did launch that study. It was done by Dr. Andy Tekauz, and I can actually send a copy of that study to the clerk, if you wish. It was that study which concluded that there are areas that still have very minimal levels of fusarium, and in those areas, that's where he said you could actually ship seed in containing a maximum of 5% and you would still maintain those very low levels in those areas.
There was another scientific study done at the same time, and the two names totally escape my brain right now; I'm getting old. They are the ones that concluded that in the areas where it is prevalent, the 10% level could work.
They were both scientific studies. I have copies of both, which I can forward to the clerk.
What we're saying at CSTA and what we've been saying all along is we certainly don't want to have a negative impact on those areas that have low levels of fusarium. It's a very significant issue. It causes some very substantial problems in the feed sector and other things. We also think that you don't have to have a one-size-fits-all policy, so you don't need zero for everybody if you have the evidence in those areas. That's why we're suggesting that perhaps there could be some zones that would accept seed at a higher level than in others, and that's what we're exploring right now. Unfortunately, since those scientific studies were done and the fusarium management task force or committee looked at them, we haven't seen any movement.