Right. Well, in terms of timeline, it depends on the issue, but what we really need are clarity, certainty, and predictability through the process. One or two years should be more than sufficient to come to a decision and a binding resolution on the issue at hand. This five-year stuff takes a lot of time, a lot of lawyers, and a lot of money to go through, and at every step of the way there's uncertainty.
Instead of the ad hoc panel approach under which the AIT currently is set up, we'd like to see a more permanent tribunal set up so you don't have to draw in a new panel every time there's an issue and get them up to speed with the issue. Some of those things really drag out the timelines. If we were to have a permanent tribunal in place, with the expertise of that tribunal available for complaints that may come forward, complaints that are not only government to government, but industry to government or individuals to government, whatever the case may be....
We think a more permanent fixture like a tribunal, emulating our experiences at the international level, should be replicated at an internal level through the AIT. It would be more predictable and would have more certainty with regard to the process involved. We think a more permanent tribunal would be a good fix.