Most of the provinces deliver the programming themselves, so the administration is theirs. As a department, we deliver Manitoba and Atlantic Canada. Every other province delivers their own and they all have little tweaks and twists. At the end of the day there's more work being done, as I said, on agri-insurance because it's more bankable and predictable than agri-stabiity or agri-recovery, which is the disaster component.
The problem that we always heard from farm groups on agri-stability was, as you rightly point out, the twists and turns, and how to make it work. It's not a bankable and predictable as insurance is. That's why, as a government, we've been working with the provinces—it's shared jurisdiction—to move more and more programming to an insurance risk base. That way it's bankable and predictable. At the end of the day, we're now seeing that happening in the livestock sector, which is much better. We're also seeing our crop insurance programming starting to cover things like unseeded acres and other issues that weren't covered before that agri-stability had to pick up. We're trying to make this as predictable as we possibly can for farmers so they know what they're up against every year.