My only comment is that I think it's absolutely imperative that we go there. As to the earlier question from Mr. Berthold, I understand the trepidation. There is some fear out there. This is science and it is advancing very quickly, so it's very prudent for us to make sure we get it right. There's no question about that, and that's where the regulatory system comes in place.
If you have the ability to grow plants with less pesticides or grow plants that use less water or less fertilizer, or grow them in places where you can't normally grow them, why would you not take advantage of that technology, given the challenge that we are facing? If you can grow rice to which you can add vitamin A and it's a staple of a diet in a country that needs vitamin A, a country where there's a deficiency, why would you not take advantage of that technology?