When we asked farmers, if they were to go out and get help, how they would like to see it, it was very definitely one-on-one. They felt, at that time anyway, that it was the preferred method, and I think that still remains. Whether or not it's one-on-one remotely, they want a caseworker who understands agriculture and who knows what they're going through.
Just to go back a bit to some of the previous comments, I think what might be missing is that when there are animal husbandry issues and we get the SPCA or CFIA in, it might be nice to have somebody in our corner, especially if someone is suffering from mental health stress. Having an advocate in our corner to help us manage those people would be great, because generally if there's an issue with animal husbandry, I don't think it's done on purpose; it's done because there are underlying factors.