It's simply a decision that's been made by an administrative body. That seems odd to me. I've not seen that. I don't think that in Canada we operate that way, and I certainly know that there are far more politics being played south of the border. Could you circulate that letter to us? I think it would be helpful in terms of tracking down who we might speak to in the United States.
The second point on this is that they have to know that whatever we come up with, it might be similar to what they have, but it won't be identical, because obviously we have provisions of bankruptcy and insolvency that are different in terms of jurisdictional complications.
Did they specifically state what elements must be included in a change in the provisions to allow whoever needs to make the decision to change the decision back? Did they actually specify what elements needed to be included in that and what didn't need to be? Or have you sent them what you think should be the solution and they have approved it, such that, yes, in fact, if that were implemented, they would reverse the decision?