I look at the notice of motion, and I see that we're talking specifically about accepting the changes that would make the claims admissible for producers. I'm not sure whether Mr. MacGregor has a list of other places around the country that are in that same situation, but I think that this particular motion is trying to be precise in dealing with the issue that is happening in Quebec right now.
I'm not sure about expanding it. We do have a program that may have to be looked at. I'm not denying that, but I think this motion is pretty specific to that area in Quebec where the drought took place and where there didn't seem to be proper communication between the producers and the crop insurance program.