I think if you look at this issue, as we talk about a science-based approach, sometimes there's a reference to the longer-term solution. I think we have to look at this from a two-pronged approach, the immediate need and the long-term solution.
Immediately, we have farmers who have product sold for cash flow needs, which they cannot deliver into the system because we can no longer export that product out of Canada. That affects the entire pipeline within Canada, from the farmer to the country grain elevators to the rail service provider to the port facilities to the service providers within the ports.
One is the urgency around existing contracts in place that are no longer able to be met because we can no longer export to China. One is the immediate need for those who have product contracted. Also, there are immediate implications in terms of farmer income and contracting options. As a result of such an important export market being lost, the price of canola for the Canadian farmer has dropped substantially. The price signals that the farmers are seeing as they're moving into a critical time, around spring seeding, have been dramatically reduced.
One is the short-term sense of urgency, but there is also the long-term solution in terms of finding a science-based approach. We need a solution, not a memorandum of understanding. We need something that is substantial.