I think there are several ways in which government infrastructure could encourage this. One is by creating a larger role for public research, because at the moment, regardless of what we see ahead or project, the reality of genetic engineering on the ground is dominated by the largest seed and pesticide companies in the world.
This is not a comfortable position for farmers either. There's a great deal of concern about the high level of corporate consolidation, which means that input costs keep rising. Consultation with farmers on the process by which genetically engineered crops and animals are allowed or approved for commercial release would assist in hearing any concerns that might be more of an issue on the ground.
For example, in the case of GM alfalfa, conventional and organic farmers were largely in consensus that there would be a very high risk of contamination if genetically modified alfalfa were commercially released. Yet it was commercially released, and farmers are left to struggle with that reality in the ground.
With each GM crop, without a consultation with farming communities, if there's a big enough issue, what you see instead is farmers advocating and even taking to the streets on particular issues.