A number of metrics are in place on each one of the programs. Let me quickly list them.
We have a program called AgriStability, which is largely about market return and insurance. We have AgriInsurance, as the previous member mentioned. That's very popular. We have a program called AgriRecovery that helps in disaster situations. We have AgriInvest, which is a program that provides money for farmers for proactive risk management or innovation. There are a couple of other smaller programs, but I'll set them aside for now.
We do a couple of things. We look at participation rates very carefully. We look at satisfaction rates with issues like predictability; in other words, will I know if this program is going to pay out and when? We look at timeliness satisfaction; in other words, does the program pay out when it should in a timely way?
Overall, those metrics produce a fairly positive set of feedback. In particular on the AgriInsurance front, timeliness, predictability, and transparency are all very positive.
I would say that AgriStability is probably our most challenging program in communicating the payout to producers, and how quickly it will come. In that area we have some work to do, which we will be talking about to ministers in July of this year.