That's a great question. First of all, I think we have tried to take a different approach than previously, especially on the research side. We are starting projects, right now, for which we have collaborations between industry—at the feedlot level in particular—and Ag Canada, the Public Health Agency, and sometimes even Environment Canada. One example would be on antimicrobial resistance. All of those stakeholders have questions about this, and the sooner everybody is involved, the more comfortable people are when research outcomes come out of projects, and then they accept the science. I think it ensures collaboration across those departments. That is one thing that has fundamentally changed in how we are funding research now through the science clusters. We haven't been able to do that and encourage that collaboration. I would strongly suggest that this needs to continue moving forward.
We have seen approvals tied up. They might even be approved within a certain section of CFIA but then also be classified. In one example, something was approved under the feed section but was then classified as a novel feed through another area.
We need to ensure that these departments are talking and using the same science, and not requiring different science by industry to answer basically the same questions.